More Pages: Mathews Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26


Making the bad guys do the right thing
Interesting View of Voter "Ignorance"First, a note about the researchers reference to Aristotelian ethos. In the theoretical foundation of the text, Lupia and McCubbins correctly interpret Aristotle's writings in On Rhetoric as asserting the power of ethos (perceived speaker credibility) on persuasive success. However, the researchers suggest:
"[I]t may be impossible for us to know much about another person's character. Aristotle concludes that persuasion requires such knowledge. We disagree...By contrast to Aristotle, we base our explanation of persuasion on the premise that people need not know one another well" (p. 42).
I believe that this assessment and interpretation of Aristotle's writings on persuasion is flawed. Aristotle was not arguing that we must know speakers well before we will listen to them; in contrast, Aristotle believed that a speaker also creates credibility during a speech, (e.g., derived credibility) and the perception of the speaker's credibility in progress affects our likelihood of being influenced in addition to the speaker's initial credibility.
I wouldn't argue that their interpretation negates their underlining theroetical foundation, but instead, that what Lupia and McCubbins argue in their theory is actually consistent with this classic view of credibility and influence. In my view, their take is not a "different" take, but instead, is a more nuanced take.
Nevertheless, this is a relatively minor point of contention. This text contains a very carefully laid out theory of voter knowledge and influence under very specific conditions, adding important nuance to our understanding of political influence and decision-making. The latter part of the book provides solid empirical research to support their theory.
A solid read for the political scholar. The researchers make a novel argument, one that raises immediate questioning by most readers, but then lays out their case in a refreshingly convincing manner.


Not entirely without merit.Illicit sex, rape and sodomy, are discussed in detail, but paedophilia is not considered as a separate subject, and is simply included under the heading of "rape," even when penile penetration did not take place and was just sexual molestation of young children. The subject of incest is ignored completely.
He gives brief details of what he calls the "ideal rapist," and records that most rapists were in their twenties or thirties, and his sample indicates that 67 percent had lowly or stigmatized occupations, including 22 agricultural laborers, one beggar, one barber, one soldier and three men out of work. Fourteen had more "respectable" occupations, mostly peasants, but two tailors, and one mat weaver. Most were poor. Most were unmarried. His conclusion is that the "ideal" rapist is young, "without property, status, family, or prospects - and hence with little stake in the social order."
He also gives brief details of the "ideal rape victim." Out of a sample of 50, twenty-eight were married, thirteen were unmarried daughters living at home, and seven were girls who were betrothed. Thirty-seven (74 percent) were raped at home. Eighteen of the victims suffered death by homicide or suicide. Eleven of the victims were eleven years of age or under. The author does not differentiate between penile penetration of these youngsters and molestation.
The sheer volume of cases the author has collected seems to have overwhelmed him, and the book becomes dangerously close to being redolent with statistics without reasoned resolution. One is drawn to the conclusion from reading this book that while rape, sodomy, and marital disputes unquestionably occurred during the Yuan, Ming, and Qing times, the percentage of court cases is relatively small, considering the size of the population.
The author boldly faces the unpleasant details of the cases, and does not shun cases of sadism and torture. He states that he owes a debt to his father, an Urologist, for his lack of squeamishness when talking about sex and the body. He says he has "not glossed over the details, and have avoided euphemism, and at time my treatment may seem detached, if not callous." In spite of this, or maybe because of this, the author's style of writing is difficult to read, and gets dangerously close to being boring. Some of the more complex cases urgently need clearer analysis and revision.
As a final point, it should be said that there is nothing salacious or prurient about this book. The author is truly detached, if not callous in his approach. There is much information in this book, and this makes it valuable, particularly to the specialist academic, but it must have a very limited audience
A very serious and difficult book

Two flaws but the rest is decent
Two blunders but the rest is decent
Taming the "paperfull office"

Conures: Everything about Purchasing, etc....
Incomplete information for conures just as pets
Not a great information source for keeping companion birds.

Professial Presentation But Dangerous Information
Looks good but disappointing in use
The new standard in quality cruising guides

Bored to Tears
"The Secret Agent" falls short on timingThe story begins with a bored, highly energized women on Wall Street. Stefani Fogg, who happens to be a Portfolio Manager, decides to throw away her career for a life of James Bond type excitement. Mathews does a great job in this book, showing how the "green" Ms. Fogg is "used" by her superiors and her enemies. The book follows two stories, the story of Stefani's adventure with Max Roderick and his Grandfather, Jack Roderick (portraying the real life CIA agent, Jim Thompson).
The story starts by concentrating on Stefani's adventure and then...boom, right when you can't wait to get to the next page, the story backtracks to the life of Jack Roderick. This is where I find fault with this book. The story tends to pull away from the most interesting and exciting parts, at the wrong time!
As the book continues, we are introduced to many characters, so much, that it takes away from the drama. At times, I found myself struggling to get through some of Jack's life (which is interesting, but I want to get back to Stefani!!). As Mathews lays out the foundation for each story line, the clutter of characters, the unnecessary or extra chapters of Jack's life, takes away from the drama in Stefani's new world.
In conclusion, the challanges of being an agent and the inexperiecne of Stefani Fogg, the (frequent) flashbacks to Jack Rodericks daily and CIA life, along with multiple characters, makes this book difficult. I understand that Mathews did intensive research on Jim Thompsons life, but I have to question the choice of such an inexperienced character to unravel one of the most complex mysteries to date.?
Francine Mathews has the talent for a 5 star book, but in honesty, this book missing that mark~!
Intricate Plot, Colorful Characters

A truly excellent guide!!!
A great guide to Fallout 2! A real must-have.- Vitali Gusatinsky
It's fantastic!

Great Intro to Oracle8i for Solaris Admins
Good book for reference use ..........
great comprehensive book

A basic outline
Good book for at home coffee treats
Indulgent and Delicious!

Prejudiced AuthorShe starts with the assumption that he is an abusive and violent man, and selectively views his life to support this distorted view.
Some examples: At p. 66 that author states: "It is not known whether Gauguin beat his children." What an outrageous statement for a purportedly objective biographer to make! It is like the proverbial qustion "When did you stop beating your wife?"
On page 62 as an example of Gauguin's "cruelty" to women is cited the fact that when Gauguin engaged in the Danish custom of men and women bathing nude at the beach he actually looked at a pretty, nude woman.
Also on page 62 the author states that when Gauguin left Denmark and returned to Paris, "Out of spite he took one of the children ..Clovis". The author offers not a sintilla of evidence to back up her statement that this action was spitefully motivated, rather than a natural paternal desire to have one of his sons with him.
Whatever merits the book may otherwise have, this obvious bias of the author makes the entire book suspect.
Fresh approach